Skip to main content

Yes, This is Partly Written in Spite- Jamie Peters

Okay, since I was shot down so quickly in class, I am going to write about the first level of Hell and the first category of sin, incontinence. I am fully aware that the place that all the pre-Christ characters are is in Limbo, a more "space between" than an actual circle of hell, and without it, the number of circles would be eight. In numerology, the number eight symbolizes balance, an equal give and take, which honestly makes sense considering that Hell is considered to be divine justice and judgement for our sins (numerology.com). In relation to that, the added ninth circle of Limbo gives the whole place a different meaning, pretty much symbolizing a mockery of the Trinity. This reasoning makes sense, considering that Hell is run by Satan, who abhors justice and God, so these two ideas combined apply perfectly.

Back to the point at hand, the first three levels of hell, Limbo, Lust, and Gluttony, deal with the sin of incontinence, or lack of self-control. In Limbo, the ancient world's greatest thinkers and writers, people such as Homer, Horace, Ovid, and Lucan, are found there, along with unborn infants (IV. 30, 86-90). By Virgil's own description, the people found in Limbo "...have not sinned. But their great worth alone / was not enough, for they did not know Baptism" (IV.34-35). Although Virgil defends their lack of sin, I believe they still fall under that sin of incontinence for their lack of control over their circumstances. It is a very Stoic idea, considering yourself at fault for events outside of your control, but I think that it is the truth nonetheless. And, besides, if they did not fall under that sin, how come they are being punished as if they had? They are forever cursed to suffer, "...cut off from hope, we live on in desire" (IV. 42). As I said in class about the lustful living in a whirlwind of their own design, the people of Limbo live in a world handcrafted by them; they found true knowledge too late, and there are no more answers to look for.


I commented on Emmett's and Rachael's posts.





"Number 8 Meaning in Numerology". Zapallas, 2021. numerology.com

Comments

  1. It is interesting that Dante put those characters in Hell and that Dante makes these characters seem "holier." Why are they the supreme beings? Since they are all in Hell, then they had commit some sort of sin. Like you said, it really could be incontinence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The whole idea of Limbo is still so strange to me. Even Dante states that the individual’s own worth is not enough to get into Heaven and, as Christians, we know that nothing we can do can ensure this. The only way to Heaven is through Christ, so I would most definitely agree with your argument.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Hailey on this one. Yes, while our worth and our good works don’t get us into Heaven and only Christ does, I’m not exactly sure where I stand on where people who never heard or had the chance to hear the gospel go when they die.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...