Skip to main content

All I Think About is Plato//Haylee Lynd




    I find it fascinating that the early believer's spiritual immaturity seems to always lead to their pridefulness. I think when I was a young believer, I behaved in the way Chapter I of Book I describes the "beginner" to behave. I thought I was accomplishing so much when I did anything "for the Lord." I felt so much pride in the fact that I didn't cuss or have social media or struggle with lust like those around me. I felt so much pride in any good works I did. I thought I knew so much about the Bible. The truth is, I was still doing all those things for my own glory. I wanted others to see that I was doing good and applaud me for those good things. I was prideful. It was not until later that I learned that all that I do is to be done for the glory of God and that sometimes that means not being seen. It was not until later that I learned that everyone struggles and that my struggles were far worse than I painted them to be in my head. I was and I am a sinner in need of a savior just as much as anyone else, if not even moreso. 
    I did not know what I didn't know. It's interesting to me how much Platonic thinking enters how I see everything now that I've read so many of his works. However, his saying that knowing what you do not know is what makes you wise is true. I have still have much to learn, but I know better what I do not know and what I cannot accomplish alone now. I am nothing without God and knowing that helps me to act more wisely. It helps me to be kinder. It humbles me. I found it so interesting how much I could relate my journey with God with this text. It was fascinating.

P.S. I commented on Brooke's and Caroline's posts.

Comments

  1. I definitely agree, Haylee. Because I’m reading all the Platonic dialogues, I realize just how much of Plato I use on a semi-regular basis. Sometimes it isn’t about what you know, it’s that you know what you don’t know but are always eager to learn.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I completely agree with you. When we think we are so good and so much more Christian than everyone else is when we are so very far off. I also agree with you and your statements about Socratic wisdom. That is probably one of the most valuable truths I will ever know and continually try to keep knowing more about.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with you completely. We become so focused on trying to perfect that we lose sight of why we are not. I couldn't help but see a parallel with Augustine during the "beginner" description. His description made me think of Augustine apologizing for sins he may have committed as a baby. Great post, and great comparisons!

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is so true that spiritual immaturity often times leads to being prideful. I like that you related the book back to your own personal life.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is so true that spiritual immaturity often times leads to being prideful. I like that you related the book back to your own personal life.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...