Skip to main content

I'm Sorry, My Explicate-y Brain Came Out Here - Jamie Peters

Dark Night of the Soul is extremely interesting for a couple of reasons. First, I am having trouble figuring out where exactly in the timeframe of the Catholic faith this occurrence of the "night of sense" is supposed to happen. According to Thomas Aquinas in his work the Summa Theologiae, the process that St. John of the Cross is describing is the journey towards perfect charity, which is what St. John calls it too. In response to the specific time frame in which this "night of sense" is supposed to occur, Aquinas says, "The spiritual increase of charity may be considered in respect of a certain likeness to the growth of the human body" (Q.24, art.9). In other words, the "night of sense", in which God "weans them from the breasts of these sweetnesses and pleasures, gives them pure aridities and inward darkness...and by all means causes them to win the virtues" is a lifelong process (St. John 1.VII.5). In making this comparison, it is clear that one primary source for St. John's philosophical debate is Thomas Aquinas, and this book will be used to explain at least two of the three stages of charity that Aquinas writes about in his Summa Theologiae. For those of you who want to know, the stages are "beginning, progress, and perfection", and I think that St. John is combining all three of these ideas into two "nights" the night of sense and the night of spirit (Aquinas Q.24, art.9).


Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. 1260.

P.S. I commented on Abigale's and Madalyn's posts.

Comments

  1. Hailey MorganApril 12, 2021 at 9:22 PM

    Having some actual, historical knowledge of the context of St. John's spiritual journey is extremely beneficial! I could not seem to categorize this procession in a normal manner and thus invented my own interpretation of the text.

    Utilizing the teachings of Aquinas makes A LOT more sense!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...
4 comments
Read more

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more