Skip to main content

I'm Sorry, My Explicate-y Brain Came Out Here - Jamie Peters

Dark Night of the Soul is extremely interesting for a couple of reasons. First, I am having trouble figuring out where exactly in the timeframe of the Catholic faith this occurrence of the "night of sense" is supposed to happen. According to Thomas Aquinas in his work the Summa Theologiae, the process that St. John of the Cross is describing is the journey towards perfect charity, which is what St. John calls it too. In response to the specific time frame in which this "night of sense" is supposed to occur, Aquinas says, "The spiritual increase of charity may be considered in respect of a certain likeness to the growth of the human body" (Q.24, art.9). In other words, the "night of sense", in which God "weans them from the breasts of these sweetnesses and pleasures, gives them pure aridities and inward darkness...and by all means causes them to win the virtues" is a lifelong process (St. John 1.VII.5). In making this comparison, it is clear that one primary source for St. John's philosophical debate is Thomas Aquinas, and this book will be used to explain at least two of the three stages of charity that Aquinas writes about in his Summa Theologiae. For those of you who want to know, the stages are "beginning, progress, and perfection", and I think that St. John is combining all three of these ideas into two "nights" the night of sense and the night of spirit (Aquinas Q.24, art.9).


Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. 1260.

P.S. I commented on Abigale's and Madalyn's posts.

Comments

  1. Having some actual, historical knowledge of the context of St. John's spiritual journey is extremely beneficial! I could not seem to categorize this procession in a normal manner and thus invented my own interpretation of the text.

    Utilizing the teachings of Aquinas makes A LOT more sense!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...