Skip to main content

It Sure is a Process - Clabo

Hey y'all, my brain is dead, and I'm sure that yours are too. However, I'm going to do my best to get across to you what I got out of these passages. I think one of my overall thoughts of this book is that it highlights and shows the intricate details of the progression of a Christian and his/her walk with Christ. Personally, I reflected a lot with this book in that I know that all of the unfortunate things I have gone through have served a purpose. They have pushed me to be closer to God and trust in Him more. Now, have a lot of those unfortunate things been brought upon by myself? Possibly, but nonetheless, God has used them to further my relationship with Him. I may not be completely on base with my discussion, but this is what came to my mind as I was reading through the sections. 

Overall, our sins as human beings come with the plan of redemption from and through God. That is one of the most important and main things I thought of regarding this book?

What are y'alls thoughts on this? 

P.S. I commented on Haylee Lynd's and Addison Zanda's posts.

Comments

  1. Trust in God is definitely a key aspect in your walk with Him. Think back with Paul in Acts 27. One of Paul's most important journeys was to Rome. He didn't get there quite the way he had expected. God is never out of control! He knows how to work things out so that the results are even better than we expected. Trusting God with your plans is a surefire plan for love and strong faith.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am glad to hear that I am not the only way that had a lot of reflecting to do while reading this. A lot of the deeper literature of the Church causes us to do that! It was refreshing though to read something that actually made me think rather than same of the mediocre writings that seem to dominate our culture today.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Reading this was a good reminder to me that the Christian walk is a journey. Reading this was a good reminder to me that I have a lot of growing to do. This also made me do a lot of self-evaluation of myself and has pushed me to do better as a Christian.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...