Skip to main content

Weakness and Strength //Emma Kate Patterson

 The first thing I noticed in The Dark Night of the Soul is how it ties back to the Bible and Christianity. At the very beginning of Book 1 of The Dark Night of the Soul it talks about realizing ones weakness. This ties back to the Christian walk in that we as Christians must realize that without the grace of God we are nothing. Every aspect of your life your life is determined by your religion. Your morals, beliefs, and purpose all tie back to your religion. Therefore for us as Christians our lives rely heavily on our religion. The book then goes on to talk about having courage and thirsting for God to give strength, virtues, and love. As Christians we must have courage and faith and trust that God will guide our paths. Although we are weak God provides us strength on our journeys to face whatever challenge is in front of us. Furthermore we as Christians base our virtues and beliefs on the Bible. We get our virtues from the Word of God. Lastly as Christians we are reminded multiple times throughout the Bible how much we are loved. This love was most evidently shown when Jesus died on the cross to save us from our sins.


I commented on Madalyn Dillard’s and Haylee Lynd’s post. 

Comments

  1. Addison ZandaApril 12, 2021 at 10:30 PM

    I love the talk on strength and weakness when it comes to a Christian aspect. I think that category can also be talked about in the realm of the "Armor of God" in Ephesians 6. We are engaged in a spiritual battle everyday. All believers find themselves in Satan's attack for the fact that we're simply not on his team. Paul tells us to use every piece of God's armor to resist Satan's attack and to stand true to God in the midst of them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Madalyn DillardApril 12, 2021 at 10:47 PM

    Good post! I loved how you connected multiple aspects of the reading to multiple aspects of the Bible. Weakness are difficult to even admit, but we, as Christians, will be safe as long as we stay firm and trust in God.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more