Skip to main content

Why Madrigals, While Dirty, Handled Love Better Than Today's Pop Music-Rachael Gregson

 


If you'll familiar with both pop music and madrigals, you'll notice that the line separating them isn't all that thick. Love/sex is all everyone wants to hear about in today's time, and love/sex was all everyone wanted to hear about back in the 16th century. Nothing has really changed when it comes to the world of music. The only difference is their delivery and perspective, and that may very well be the most important. The people during that time were subtle and didn't stray beyond an innuendo. You have to remember they were just coming out of that quiet phase, where music was sacred. In their songs, they treated love/sex like a playful secret, where only the knowledge acquired the meaning and understood. Nowadays, innuendos rarely exist. We just come right out and say it explicitly, which in my view, loses the magic that is love. Some things are better left vague, sometimes a lack of privacy and discretion ruins what is meant to be done in private. We live in a culture where things don't count as reality unless they're "out on display".  While madrigals revolved around sex/lust too, they did not value it above love itself. They still valued their beloveds rather than valued just what their beloveds could give them, whereas any song that comes on the radio says otherwise and completely paints sexual intimacy to be nothing more than a fleeting moment of pleasure, not a lifelong commitment. 

I commented on posts by Brooke and Lily.

Comments

  1. My goodness, this is so true! Our modern-day pop songs are riddled with some of the worst sexual descriptions and obscene meanings. Today's artists do not hold back, either.

    As we read through Medieval poetry and look at old madrigal ballads, we are only able to see the bad beneath the frills once it has been fully explained.

    In addition, the balance of religious versus secular music has also been tipped. Nowadays, it is much more common to listen to worldly music than hymns that honor the Lord.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I see your point about being discret about their feelings of sex in Madrigals is better than today's pop music, but I disagree. I think both are evenly sinful. I believe a sin is still a sin (even when it is not seen or hidden).

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you made some very valid points. I feel as if the madrigals were more respectful, however, than the artists are today. I also feel as if they were more passionate about their music and the stories that their music told than most pop artists you would hear on the radio are.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...

Welcome to Honors! (Please Read This)

     Welcome to Honors! My name is Abbie Hedden and I serve as President of Honors. Jamie Peters is our Vice President, and Caroline Tucker is our Secretary. I look forward to getting to know all of you in class during this upcoming year! There are a few things you need to know about Honors.      There are no quizzes or tests in Honors. Grades are provided based on attendance/class participation, blogs, explication papers, and the research paper. The papers will be addressed at a later date, as they aren't due until later in the semester. However, there is a blog post due every week. Bearing that in mind, here are the requirements! Criteria Blog posts are due Monday at 11:59PM , and comments are due Tuesday at 9:29AM . DO NOT BE LATE ON ASSIGNMENTS. Points WILL be deducted from late assignments! Be sure to have your name in your Blogger profile Blog posts should include at least one to two paragraphs on that week’s reading assignment.  Blog posts shoul...

Topsy Turvy Day—Lily Caswell

  I cannot remember how old I was when I watched T he Hunchback of Notre Dame  but I was at least 8 or 9. I didn’t realize until probably a couple of years ago that the song  “Topsy Turvy” and the corresponding event was actually based on a real festival. The Feast of Fools was usually held on January 1 though it could have also been held on the 6 th  or the 13 th  of January. It was portrayed as a parody of Catholic feasts. Church bells were rung improperly, songs were sung out of tune, and the celebrants “wore strange garments and masks, and used puddings, sausages, and old shoes as censers.” (Seaton, p 77) In the song “Topsy Turvy”, it says “It’s the day the devil in us gets released / It’s the day we mock the prig and shock the priest / Everything is Topsy Turvy at the Feast of Fools… And it’s the day we do the things that we deplore ‘ On the other three hundred and sixty-four.”  I commented on Haylee Lynd’s and Jamie’s posts. Sources: https://www.brita...