Skip to main content

Why Madrigals, While Dirty, Handled Love Better Than Today's Pop Music-Rachael Gregson

 


If you'll familiar with both pop music and madrigals, you'll notice that the line separating them isn't all that thick. Love/sex is all everyone wants to hear about in today's time, and love/sex was all everyone wanted to hear about back in the 16th century. Nothing has really changed when it comes to the world of music. The only difference is their delivery and perspective, and that may very well be the most important. The people during that time were subtle and didn't stray beyond an innuendo. You have to remember they were just coming out of that quiet phase, where music was sacred. In their songs, they treated love/sex like a playful secret, where only the knowledge acquired the meaning and understood. Nowadays, innuendos rarely exist. We just come right out and say it explicitly, which in my view, loses the magic that is love. Some things are better left vague, sometimes a lack of privacy and discretion ruins what is meant to be done in private. We live in a culture where things don't count as reality unless they're "out on display".  While madrigals revolved around sex/lust too, they did not value it above love itself. They still valued their beloveds rather than valued just what their beloveds could give them, whereas any song that comes on the radio says otherwise and completely paints sexual intimacy to be nothing more than a fleeting moment of pleasure, not a lifelong commitment. 

I commented on posts by Brooke and Lily.

Comments

  1. My goodness, this is so true! Our modern-day pop songs are riddled with some of the worst sexual descriptions and obscene meanings. Today's artists do not hold back, either.

    As we read through Medieval poetry and look at old madrigal ballads, we are only able to see the bad beneath the frills once it has been fully explained.

    In addition, the balance of religious versus secular music has also been tipped. Nowadays, it is much more common to listen to worldly music than hymns that honor the Lord.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I see your point about being discret about their feelings of sex in Madrigals is better than today's pop music, but I disagree. I think both are evenly sinful. I believe a sin is still a sin (even when it is not seen or hidden).

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you made some very valid points. I feel as if the madrigals were more respectful, however, than the artists are today. I also feel as if they were more passionate about their music and the stories that their music told than most pop artists you would hear on the radio are.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...