Skip to main content

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into. 

However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be. 

What are your thoughts and ideas? 

P.S. I commented on Rachael Gregson's and Caroline Tucker's posts.

Comments

  1. When I say I got whiplash reading your post, I mean it. Your post perfectly reveals how "Star Wars: The Clone Wars" handled the clones. All of them are clones to begin with, and they are only taught what they needed to serve the republic, and the clones that stood out to the audience are the ones that saw things outside of their "class".

    ReplyDelete
  2. Because I wrote on the positives of Books III and IV, it's nice to read about the negatives. I highly respect Socrates's careful handling of integrity and value, but I really wish he wouldn't have made censorship mandatory. You start to question the intention behind things when they are forced and not so much suggested...

    ReplyDelete
  3. I completely agree with you. The censorship for the production of soldiers and the brainwashing of its citizens is something we would consider to be so inhumanness, so unjust. It just feels wrong. Yet, all this is necessary to maintain the social structure that will maintain the most amount of justice and good for the city as a whole, and because the citizens are basically brainwashed, they have no idea what they're missing out on. In theory, they are happier. It makes one question what we are giving up by placing such a high value on freedom.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well what it begs to tell the difference of is the value America places on Personal choice. We don't seek to train clones. The us military seeks order but at the same time relies on the personal decision making and critical thinking of the moment. Hooray Improv fighting! I joke but the stories I have been told by my grandfather and other military relatives consistently reveals the power in one single decision.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with your point of view. I feel like their idea of education for the guardians is not true education. They are teaching the guardians what to think, not how to think for themselves, which ultimately produces clones.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...