Skip to main content

Is the Pythia Possessed?—Lily Caswell

        Is the Pythia possessed by a kind of demon? Maybe I’m pulling teeth here, but in between lines 33 and 34, it says that “She goes through the doors and reappears in a moment, shaken, thrown to her knees by some terrific force.” (Aeschylus, p 232) I don’t believe in ghosts, but I do believe in angels and demons. The Pythia might also be on some kind of hallucinogenic drug. It is said that when visitors came to the Oracle to have their future told to them, that the Pythia would go into a room and come back out in some sort of trance, possibly caused by certain gasses coming up out of the earth. It may be a combination of the two.

        According to Greek mythology, the Pythia would mutter words that were incomprehensible to most people. Which makes me wonder how the Pythia can say coherent sentences in The Eumenides when everywhere else priests have to translate her gibberish to the people because she’s muttering almost to herself. Did anyone else find this as interesting as I did?


I commented on Jamie’s and Braylan‘s posts.


Sources:


https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-greece/delphi

Comments

  1. IsabelleSeptember 21, 2020 at 8:30 PM

    That description also gave me pause, and, normally, I have trouble getting into Aeschylus' writing. You are right about the drugs the Pythia would take, and I have doubts the Priests even understood and just muttered gibberish of their own. We know the effects of drugs on the people in our society. My question is: How long did it take before the Pythia died or went mad?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jessef LeslieSeptember 21, 2020 at 10:54 PM

    I did as well but I'm pretty certain she saw the ghost of Clytaemnestra that the Furies also see and speak to in the same shrine of Apollo. And it is a play so having her run out screaming in tongue might not be as entertaining

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

      I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve.      The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes  tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quic...
1 comment
Read more