Skip to main content

Is the Pythia Possessed?—Lily Caswell

        Is the Pythia possessed by a kind of demon? Maybe I’m pulling teeth here, but in between lines 33 and 34, it says that “She goes through the doors and reappears in a moment, shaken, thrown to her knees by some terrific force.” (Aeschylus, p 232) I don’t believe in ghosts, but I do believe in angels and demons. The Pythia might also be on some kind of hallucinogenic drug. It is said that when visitors came to the Oracle to have their future told to them, that the Pythia would go into a room and come back out in some sort of trance, possibly caused by certain gasses coming up out of the earth. It may be a combination of the two.

        According to Greek mythology, the Pythia would mutter words that were incomprehensible to most people. Which makes me wonder how the Pythia can say coherent sentences in The Eumenides when everywhere else priests have to translate her gibberish to the people because she’s muttering almost to herself. Did anyone else find this as interesting as I did?


I commented on Jamie’s and Braylan‘s posts.


Sources:


https://www.history.com/topics/ancient-greece/delphi

Comments

  1. IsabelleSeptember 21, 2020 at 8:30 PM

    That description also gave me pause, and, normally, I have trouble getting into Aeschylus' writing. You are right about the drugs the Pythia would take, and I have doubts the Priests even understood and just muttered gibberish of their own. We know the effects of drugs on the people in our society. My question is: How long did it take before the Pythia died or went mad?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jessef LeslieSeptember 21, 2020 at 10:54 PM

    I did as well but I'm pretty certain she saw the ghost of Clytaemnestra that the Furies also see and speak to in the same shrine of Apollo. And it is a play so having her run out screaming in tongue might not be as entertaining

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.
3 comments
Read more

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...
2 comments
Read more