Skip to main content

Allegory of the Cave (Because I'm Uncreative)~ Logan Turner

 Ah, yes. The allegory of the cave. One of my favorite lessons from philosophy that I learned over a year ago. It's a shame I don't really remember much of it. I will, however, try my best and give you the rundown from what I have left over in my notes. 

So the cave, as I understood it, is about education. I think we all understood that, right? Leaving the cave and learning about the outside world is a pretty blatant example of education. But what stuck with me the most are what Dr. Mashburn called the "confusions." Basically, there are two "confusions," or transitional periods, one while going from the darkness to light, and one while going from light to darkness. The dark period is one of ignorance (duh) and the light period is about knowledge (again, duh). So what he calls confusions are basically periods where you are learning something that conflicts with previously held beliefs. For instance, learning that there is more to life than the shadows on the wall. 

What I understood this to mean is that, in the pursuit of true knowledge, you have to go from the darkness to the light, even though the transition period may be miserable. You are also responsible for taking others out of that cave, so that they too can learn the value of knowledge, and in turn, do the same.

Edit: Commented on Haylee Lynd's and Lily Caswell's posts

Comments

  1. ClaboOctober 5, 2020 at 11:03 PM

    I completely agree with you, being faced with light and darkness is definitely a confusion, especially when it comes to determining which is which. However, what I would like to ask is what do you think would happen if a person was dragged out of the cave but they did not join the cause and help drag out others like them?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jackson RiddleOctober 5, 2020 at 11:53 PM

    Going from dark to light, or ignorance to knowledge, can definitely be confusing at times, especially when it challenges the basis of all that we know to be true. The question I would like to pose is this: say you were unable to free your fellow inmates from their shackles. How would you go about trying to explain your enlightenment to them? Would you even try? (an example of this is page 210 of The Republic, when a prisoner escapes and attempts to describe the objects casting the shadows).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Word Painting in Vesta—Lily Caswell

  Word painting in Weelkes’s As Vesta Was from Latmos Hill Descending is quite interesting. And because that is a really long title, I’m calling it Vesta from now on. Word painting is basically when the melody matches up with the lyrics. So in Vesta, when it says “ascending” and “descending”, there are obviously scales going up and down. The madrigal was written for six voices to sing unaccompanied, so when they start to come together, it matches with the lyrics; so if the lyric says “two by two”, there are only two voices; “three by three” there is another voice added, and so forth. All the parts combine in exclamation before Vesta before it is left “all alone” to the highest soprano. All the way to the end of the piece, word painting continues when shouts of “Long live fair Oriana” with the bass sustaining long notes. Word painting in and of itself is a highly interesting topic because a musician takes the words of a poem or a sonnet and writes a melody line that pertains to cer...
4 comments
Read more

Honor and Gain; Which Do You Seek?

 Pericles.... thanks? I can only imagine that's what the family and friends were thinking after they heard his historic funeral speech honoring the departed. What do I mean? Well, Pericles briefly mentions the men who have fallen at the beginning of his speech, but then goes on to discuss how great Athens is, and how the contributions the city has made to the world are unmatched.. why? I understand that he is also commending the citizens of Athens and empowering them to continue to make their city greater, but I thought this was supposed to be a funeral speech about dead war heroes, not about Athens. Another thing I found interesting is what Pericles said on page five about honor: "For it is only the love of honour that never grows old; and honour it is, not gain, as some would have it, that rejoices the heart of age and helplessness" (Thucydides, page 5). Have you ever watched a show or movie, or read a book, about a duel between two men? There is always an unspoken agre...
Post a Comment
Read more

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...
2 comments
Read more