Skip to main content

One shall stand, One shall fall // Ian Blair

     I usually have a little introduction into my thoughts about the reading for this week before I start with the actual blog part of my post, but I can't help but think about the bone-chilling realization that awaits us in Book VIII, so my introduction this time will be brief. It is my personal opinion that if people are imperfect, then we are only capable of imperfect systems and societies consequentially. However, this does not mean that we must not aim for the closest system to perfect that we can achieve. 

    The realization I wrote of earlier is the suggestion by Socrates that tyranny stems from the system we know as democracy. At first I disagreed, it is anarchism that causes tyrannical reign as a byproduct of fulfilling its purpose of overthrowing the current power and not establishing another system. All anarchism does is create a power vacuum for another power to take over and the cycle repeats itself, right? ...Right? Quickly after this initial reaction however, I remembered of how people such as Adolf Hitler rose to power in the midst of a war torn Germany by using his gifts in speech and deception to gain a following, and ultimately power. It was not through absolute decimation, but by mass manipulation that Hitler first formed his nazi party that then used force to assert control of the country. The next question to pose is where does the tyranny begin? The obvious answer comes from the end the discussion of democracy: 

"At last, when they observe the people attempting to wrong them---not voluntarily but because of ignorance and because they are misled by slander---they become oligarchs indeed. . .The consequences are  accusations, arraignments, and litigations of all kinds originating from either sides. . .And the people---is there not always the propensity to elevate and glorify one man as the people's protector and champion?. . .Then we have located the tyrant's point of entry into society." (Plato, 257). 

In order to prevent the order democracy represents and embodies from falling into chaos, the mass majority of people in said system must be informed and educated enough so that they can't be easily manipulated against the system. Too often in modern society we face the mass spread of misinformation simply because we do not exercise our civic duties of being the wisest and most intelligent citizens that we can be; and I for one am not yet ready to see the closest example to freedom that exist today fall into the ashes of chaos and humiliation.


P.s. I commented on Hailey Morgan's and Micah's posts.

Comments

  1. Ian, you wrote on a very good point. I think this is why we should always stay on top of what's going on in the world's current events. Two things can sucker people into handing too much control to their authorities: ignorance and complacency.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Not a Hallmark.. NOT A HALLMARK - Clabo

I completely forgot how tragic the relationship between Dido and Aeneas was. The thought that Venus originally caused Dido to fall in love with Aeneas through Cupid for no other reason than to just provide Aeneas and his troops' safety is so aggravating. Venus used Dido and her resources at the ultimate and unfortunate expense of her life. She did not naturally fall in love with him, and she wasn't supposed to in the first place. Everyone knows that Aeneas and the Trojans have to make it to Italy to make their new city/empire, and this most assuredly means that they would not be able to stay in Carthage.  I also think that Juno is to blame for a lot of it, however, because the caused her and Aeneas to end up alone in a cave during a storm. You would think that if Juno cared so much for Carthage that she would not have caused/helped cause the death of the city's queen. This was just overall very unfortunate in all aspects. What are your thoughts and opinions? P.S. I commente...