Skip to main content

"What I want to do I do not do..."

            This weeks reading hit different. I can usually find some way to relate the reading to the Bible, but this time It's more than just some observation. As I read on through Aristotle's ramblings about virtue, trying my best not to zone out, one segment really stuck out. It says, referring to virtuous actions, "But most people do not do these, but take refuge in theory and think they are being philosophers and will become good in this way, behaving somewhat like patients who listen attentively to their doctors, but do none of the things they are ordered to do" (Aristotle). I think this quote is true about what Christianity looks like for a lot of people. It's so easy to go to church every week and listen to the pastor  (throwing in an "amen" here and there to spice it up). It's easy to agree with what the pastor is saying and the points he is making. We leave feeling good about ourselves and our faith, but then, life just happens... Covid happens...unexpected news comes... hurricanes hit... 

        It's easy to agree with a pastor or sing worship songs, but do we live out what we claim we so adamantly agree with? When we are hit with difficult circumstances, do we use them as a way to live the life we are called to live? Romans 7:15-20 says, "I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do.  And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good.  As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me.  For I know that good itself does not dwell in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out.  For I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing.  Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it. " So often the easy way out is more appealing, but we are called to stand up and carry out the good. 

I am mostly preaching to myself here, but how do you feel about it?


Commented on Haylee Lynd's and Caroline Tucker's

Sources: 

http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html 

Comments

  1. Yes! I am constantly having to remind myself the reason behind why I do things. This thought will bring me to the realization of whether or not I should be doing the thing. This is especially true for school work. I am easily distracted and once I am distracted, I am distracted for the next few hours. I cannot focus. If I cannot focus on my school work, how will I focus on God? Thankfully, it is not through me but through God’s influence and conviction that I have the ability to focus on Him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I completely agree with you. We have such a hard time not doing what can easily be determined as wrong in hindsight. Sometimes I think that its not so much as difficult to choose not to sin, but rather that it is extremely difficult to consistently do what is good and focus only on that. We are sinful creatures, and for the most part we mainly want to do what we want to do. It is just difficult to determine if what we want is what we shouldn't.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...