Skip to main content

Andromache is Married?!?! - Caroline Tucker

 I have to say I was very concerned as I read the first book. I was having a hard time understanding anything that was going on. Thank the Lord for online explanations. Sometimes reading an explanation after reading a passage is very helpful to understanding the meaning behind things. Thankfully, by the third book I was able to grasp what I was reading without any help. That is the goal! 

There is a lot to be said of the three books we were assigned to read. At one point, I had an epiphany, and had to run get my copy of the Iliad to confirm my suspicions. As soon I saw the name Andromache in book III, I had to stop and think “Is that not Hector’s wife?”. I ran and grabbed the Iliad and realized that I was correct. You have no idea how excited I was that one of my favorite characters to write on is in the Aeneid and survived the violence that was definitely around her. 

My excited feeling slowly dissipated as I realized that she remarried. After some thought, I realized, that in that time period, it was unheard of a woman to be widowed at such an age and not remarry. What really intrigued me was how often she would mention Hector and how much she loved and missed him. When we are first introduced to her she “Was making from a ceremonial meal / Her offerings and libation to the dust, / Calling the great shade at a tomb called Hector’s / made by her” (Virgil, 3.409-411). Andromache was out sacrificing at the empty grave of her late husband. Imagine being her new husband and constantly seeing her leave to sacrifice at the husband she loved’s grave. As well as hearing her express her love of him and missing him with her whole being. 

I would imagine that most men would not be very happy to hear their wife constantly admonishing and missing her late husband. However, from what I have seen so far of her new husband, Helenus, he does not seem to be of that character. He seems to be understanding of her grief and despair. I completely understand that I could be misinterpreting the entire situation. What do you think?


P.s. I commented on Haylee Lynd’s and Rachael’s posts.

Comments

  1. Jamie PetersNovember 11, 2020 at 10:39 PM

    In Judaism, there is a common ritual performed in which a relative, an in-law, or anyone willing to will step in for the widowed and the young in order to marry them and care for them. The best example of this concept can be found here: "Then Naomi said to her daughter-in-law, 'May the Lord bless him because he has not abandoned his kindness to the living or the dead.' Naomi continued, 'The man is a close relative. He is one of our family redeemers.'" (Ruth 2:20). I believe this ritual is also carried out by Helenus and Andromache.

    ReplyDelete
  2. abbieheddenNovember 11, 2020 at 11:04 PM

    I know when my mom lost her first husband, she remarried within two years. Her new husband (my adopted dad) told me years down the road that he felt like she didn't truly move on from her first husband for years after they got married. He said it was rough goings at first, but he realized that grieving is a process that doesn't really have a timeline. Everyone grieves at different rates. I think that Helenus might have come to the same conclusion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. kaitlyn terryNovember 11, 2020 at 11:41 PM

    I love how supportive he seems of her and the grief that she is dealing with. He doesn't seem to give her a hard time for leaving and grieving over her deceased husband and I really respect that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lovers of Wisdom, Not Power—Lily Caswell

In Book VIII of Plato’s Republic, Socrates talks about the possibility of having a well-governed city. However, he also talks about how that particular form of government is impossible to have. A well-governed city becomes a possibility only if you can discover a better way of life for your future rulers than holding office.” (Plato, p 215) Maybe his version of a better life was for those in office to not be lovers of power, since it would then become a fight among rival lovers. Socrates gets to the point that the only rulers who don’t love power are true philosophers. Philosophers are lovers of wisdom and knowledge and not power, ergo they are the perfect rulers. Absolute power corrupts and power corrupts absolutely, so I’m thinking that maybe the trick to being a good ruler is for you to be a philosophical person who loves wisdom and not power. I commented on Jamie’s and Isabelle’s posts.
4 comments
Read more

How to Make a Clone - Clabo

I found books three and four to be very cringy. I mean, to me the idea of structurally producing good soldiers/guardians through heavy censorship is somewhat inhumane. I feel as if human beings should be allowed to experience every bit of knowledge they can at some point in their lives. To me, it seems as if the guardians are being guarded against information throughout their entire lives so they can solely fulfill the duties they were birthed into.  However, the influence and importance Plato places on poetry and music do make me wonder what it would be like if we had the same values as our military today. What if the United States military invested in the souls of its soldiers and placed within them emotional and intellectual values outside of what they have learned previously. Perhaps the military instills values and principles within soldiers to fulfill the same purpose as the guardians would in Plato's Republic and that is to only be that which the government wants you to be....
5 comments
Read more

Dystopian Origins Uncovered ////// Isabelle Ferguson

  I think that ideas eventually run out of originality and circle back to the original idea. During this week's reading, many of Socrates’ suggestions for a place of perfection reminded me of some novels I’ve read depicting dystopian worlds. Disclaimer: There are spoilers ahead. You have been warned.        To begin, in  The  Giver  by Lois Lowry censorship is a major theme. The novel is centered around a boy who is receiving memories withheld from the population! The government in The Giver is especially careful to censor the memories that may cause strife, anger, fear, sadness, etc. In the adults, this society is cemented. So, the government is especially strict with the youth. Socrates talks about verses to “obliterate” to prevent the descriptions from doing “harm to our future warriors” for the better half of Book III (Plato, page 44). The warriors he speaks of are the youth. He goes on to list the multitude of verses that should be done ...
7 comments
Read more