Skip to main content

I'm Sorry, Led Zeppelin, But There's No Stairway To Heaven....-Brooke Hutcheson

     As a Christian, I find Dante's writing eye-opening. Dante's interpretation of Hell is interesting since everything has a deeper allegorical meaning; he really thinks about the things which we do not like to think about-- unbelievers burning in Hell for eternity. I believe human nature makes us steer away from the negative and only look or think about the positive. For example, when someone has to tell us about a certain scenario with good news and bad news, most people choose to hear the bad news first and the positive news second. 

    Why are we like this? Sometimes, I think we need to talk about the bad subjects in life. I feel like the only way to change issues in society is by speaking up and by striving to change. I am sure Dante knew he would have many naysayers against him, but he also knew he would have many people who wanted change in their culture. 

    I believe The Inferno is meant to bring conviction to Christians to evangelize to nonbelievers, because their future depends on us. In Bible class in high school, my Bible teacher played this video called "Letter From Hell." The video is about a guy who goes to Hell and writes a letter to his friend who was a believer. In the letter, the guy in Hell blames his friend (the believer) for not telling him about Jesus. I do not know about you, but that is truly convicting to me. 

I commented on Hailey Morgan and Jamie Peters's posts. 

Comments

  1. I really enjoy this take-away as it is something that I have never thought about before. This will be my second time reading Inferno and, just like last time, I easily became caught-up in the overall journey. Never before have I paused and taken a moment to see the bigger picture of what Dante's intentions could have been.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I remember the Letter from Hell was terrifying to me anyways. https://youtu.be/JXPDa_CGjTE
    If you haven’t seen it and want to see it, I posted the link above. It is terrifying, but for some reason I do not get the same feeling while reading the Inferno. Maybe I get caught up in the story like Hailey. Although, I do think I should start reading it with more conviction.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aristotle Might Not Like Me...Or Jesus//Haylee Lynd

      Aristotle says that the man who does not get angry at the things he should be angry at "is thought unlikely to defend himself; and to endure being insulted and put up with insult to one's friends is slavish" (Aristotle 41). While he states that passivity is preferred to excessive anger, he still gives great criticism to it.  In contrast to Aristotle, the man who Christians believe to be the most just is Jesus who states in Matthew 5:39-40, "...do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Essentially, arguing that one is not to respond in anger when insulted or hurt, to not defend one's self. Most individual's are unable to achieve this. Our natural instinct is to defend ourselves, especially in physical cases. However, Christians strive to be like Jesus in this way. I would also argue that it is a very admirable wa...

Oedipus’ Children/Siblings—Lily Caswell

Ok, so Oedipus is a bit of a train wreck to say the least. I love the fact that even after Oedipus found out about his less-than-appealing relationship with his mother, he still tried to look after his children/siblings. After he gouged his eyes out, his children came to him at which point Oedipus talked about how that when they were old enough to marry, no one would want them due to them being products of incest. He said for the people not to condemn them based on what their father had done. Even after he knew what he had done and what his children were, he still wanted the best for them. I commented on Logan’s and Ian’s posts.

Overanalyzing Everyone's Intentions Here-Rachael Gregson

 First off, I'd like to say this is going to be a two part blog post, because a lot of things happened in this reading assignment that demands to be discussed.  As with any war I've realized, it's tricky not to fall into the initial perspective I am given. I began this book skeptical of Hector because I was bias toward the movie Troy, which was told mostly through the eyes of Achilles, but neither were what I was expecting. It's actually funny that they both hold values completely opposite from one another. Hector represented everything related to city-state pride, honor, and humility whereas Achilles was everything wild, reckless, and unpredictable solitary. This isn't to say that Hector is all good and Achilles all bad. Both had instances where I rooted for the other more or less. I just thought it was interesting how their two personalities represented something that basically causes all wars: the clash between civilization and savagery.  Secondly, I'm not de...